You should see corresponding changes in both at the same time. The thing to track is the change in the stats more than the absolute numbers. I've also seen them track very well with impressions from DoubleClick ads. The GA numbers will track closely with AdSense and AdWords impressions. Are you certain you are looking at pageviews in AW, not hits? Each page represents several hits because a "hit" occurs with each piece of information, such as an image.
The faster your website, the lower this difference will be, but your numbers seem extreme. Typically this is the biggest reason that AW numbers are higher. If someone leaves before the page is finished rendering, GA doesn't count it, but AW will. Google Analytics uses a Javascript function which is called after the page is rendered. This gives it a picture of absolutely every access to your server.
#Analytics awstats install
If you are looking to provide credible third party verification of your traffic to advertisers I highly recommend using Quantcast, it is as easy to install as Google analytics, and allows for trusted third party verification of not just visits but actual visitors and demographics of those visitors.ĪWStats uses your webserver's log files. third party), they are less frequently blocked by browsers and will give you slightly more data. Piwik) on the same domain (first party script vs. If you want more accurate browser stats then install a hosted analytics package (i.e. The browser stats give you browser data and tell you what you need to know about the people visiting your website.Ī very small percentage of browsers block Javascript and those that do primarily block third party scripts. The server stats show you server stats, which is useful to understand server loads and spider traffic. You just need to learn to appreciate the extra data that you have at your disposal, instead of lamenting that you have more (and different) data than you expected. They track what they are supposed to track and they should be different if they are tracking properly. Those two different analytic programs track 2 very different things. There is no need to choose to be depressed. I personally find the degree of this discrepancy a bit depressing - it means that all the actual numbers are pretty much meaningless. Other website: using Joost Analytics plugin One website: using tomatosoft Analytics plugin If looking to sell advertising space on your site, quote both sets of figures to prospective advertisers - or ask them which they would like.įor my own sites the Ratios for Analyics:Awstats are: Take home message: use either or both to track trends, and most visited pages etc but not one of these sites gives you accurate numbers. How about Alexa? Apparently it's even more unreliable than either Awstats or Analytics, due to limitations on their data gathering methods. Therefore, Awstats data will also be lower than the correct count, but by not as much as Analytics is.
#Analytics awstats download
Awstats only counts those who download the page from the server when they visit, and so will not count anyone who has the page cached from their last visit, or who accesses the page via a caching service. Many of your techy visitors will have blocked AnalyticsĤ. Google Analytics does not collect data from visitors without JavaScript, or with JavaScript disabledģ. Awstats includes crawler visits in their data, and Google doesn'tĢ. Well I found the answer to my own question - there are lots of reasons for this discrepancy, I'll list a few here:ġ.